Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(8)
This general analysis, showing a main effect of the type of motion on the mean looking time during the first sequence only, suggested that the neonates' behavior changed over time.
Planned comparison confirmed that the type of motion was mostly influential during the first sequence (sequence 1: F (1,49) = 4.27, p = .044; sequence 2: F (1,49) = 1.05, p = .30).30
This pattern suggests that, in addition to the general difference in fronto-parietal coherence between good and bad imitators, good imitators pay better attention to, or are better able to integrate information, about action goals (left/right button) and action means (left/right hand) during the first sequence presentation.
Therefore during the first sequence with glucose the optimal pH for H2 production was determined for the pure strains and for the co-cultures.
The biogas production rate measured during the first sequence was similar to that recorded during the batch glucose fermentation at fixed pH (1.45 L biogas/ h; Table 3).
The results shown in Fig. 9 show that the stress during the second LAOS sequence is qualitatively the same as during the first sequence, but the maximal stress values during the cycles are slightly lower.
Similar(52)
The N2/P2 amplitude did not change significantly across the three stimulation sequences during the SCS-OFF phase (P = 0.22), whereas it decreased progressively during the second and third sequence (to 87.1 ± 29.5% and 76.4 ± 24.1%, respectively) compared with the first sequence, during the SCS-ON phase (P = 0.014).
To minimise Na loss from melt inclusions during the analysis, Na was analysed in the first sequence.
Group behavior was very similar during the second sequence.
To resume these results: the neonates spent more time looking at the non-biological motions and they spent less time looking at the motions during the second sequence.
Surprisingly, the highest hydrogen yield of 2.32 mol H2/mol glucose was also measured during the second sequence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com