Sentence examples for during argumentation processes from inspiring English sources

This paper presented a question generation approach using WordNet for supporting students during argumentation processes.

In many application contexts the information available to start reasoning is not guaranteed to be completely reliable, therefore it is natural to assume that premises can be discarded during the argumentation process.

In terms of the science concepts addressed during the argumentation process, group F addressed all the ten while group E only addressed four.

But there is more to say within a game-theoretical framework about the connection between formal dialogues and other kind of argumentation processes where atomic sentences are justified.

However, with futher knowledge at its disposal, it would be possible to create extra arguments and thus have a more complex argumentation process.

The proposed approach is designed to scaffold the following aspects of argumentation: the argumentation process, the explanation structuring, explanation construction, and explanation evaluation.

In addition, the experimental group students' on-line argumentation process was collected.

In the field of computational argumentation several formalisms featuring different levels of abstraction and focusing on different aspects of the argumentation process have been developed.

Thus, the dialogues amount to conducting an argumentation process in ABA.

If there were a way to track a student's cognitive process during argumentation, it would then be possible for us to trace their alternative conceptions in science.

They also highlighted that questioning could serve as heuristic devices to stimulate dialectical thinking during argumentation; act as starting points for expressions of doubts, rebuttals and counterarguments.