Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
The aim of this study was to compare the conventional technique with the use of the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope for TEE probe insertion in terms of success rate, duration of insertion, and complications in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
Age >73 years [odds ratio (OR) 6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.28 28.05] was positively associated with local catheter-related complications, whereas duration of insertion (until 72 h) (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09 0.89) and the implementation of guidelines (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09 0.67) were negatively associated with local catheter-related complications.
The median (IQR ICUU length of stay before a CLBSI occurred was 8 (3 to 14) days, and the median duration of insertion for CLBSI lines were internal jugular 132 (120 to 168) hours, femoral 98 (96 to 115) hours and subclavian 670 (397 to 702) hours.
The duration of insertion time was measured with a stopwatch.
The duration of insertion was about 30 sec.
We compared both techniques; we noted the number of attempts, the duration of insertion and complications.
Similar(46)
Successful matings within twenty minutes were noted, and for these matings the time until spicule insertion and the duration of spicule insertion were recorded.
Using the findings from Experiment 1, Experiment 2 investigated the effect of reducing the duration of IPRD insertion and increasing the interval from IPRD removal to ODB treatment (modified protocol 1 – OPO-6; n = 20), and omitting ODB treatment at the time of IPRD insertion (modified protocol 2 – PO-6; n = 20).
Data concerning duration of line insertion and reason for removal was collected from our clinical information system Innovian® and analysed using SPSS.
The size of the inhibition zone against a reference S. epidermidis correlated inversely with the duration of catheter insertion but was greater than 10 mm for a duration of 60 days [84].
The average duration of PAC insertion was 2.6 days (range 0 11.7 days).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com