duplication of infrastructure

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "duplication of infrastructure" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing redundancy, efficiency, or resource allocation in systems, projects, or organizations. Example: "The duplication of infrastructure in our city has led to increased costs and inefficiencies in service delivery."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Even worse than the car itself is the sprawl and the energy-inefficient lifestyle that it enables — the duplication of infrastructure, larger houses with fertilized, irrigated yards, two-hour commutes.

The New York Times - Books

It's part of the company's strategy of providing "open infrastructure to competing service providers" that avoids the duplication of infrastructure investment that more traditional competition entails and is said to offer "a model for the industry that can be rolled-out across the world".

TechCrunch

The downside of federation is that it is hard to guarantee access, in particular as individuals move between institutions, and there is duplication of infrastructure costs.

GigaScience

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

"Winding the clock back to pre-ESF times of duplication of infrastructures and waste of resources would not be a progress," he wrote.

Science Magazine

"Our customers want as few duplications of infrastructure as possible".

The New York Times

Regionalization may also reduce costs by reducing duplication of expensive infrastructure and resources [ 14].

Critical Care

It is not a duplication of what national infrastructure managers are already doing today.

EU Parlament

Consequently, there has been substantial duplication of effort and incompatible infrastructure developed across many research groups.

Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Coordination between country governments and donors is also important to avoid duplication of activities and to solve infrastructure challenges.

Global health, science and practice

Regionalization may improve efficiency in the delivery of healthcare by reducing duplication of costly and scarce resources and infrastructure, as well as improving economies through higher case volumes and improved efficiency and economies of scale (cost advantages derived from advantageous purchasing, managerial and financial practices with increased case volumes).

Critical Care

Missouri Development Finance Board, $69.6 million of infrastructure refinancing revenue bonds.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing infrastructure projects, clearly specify the type of infrastructure (e.g., "duplication of IT infrastructure") to provide context and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vague references to "duplication of infrastructure" without explaining the consequences, such as increased costs or reduced efficiency. Always clarify why the duplication is problematic.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "duplication of infrastructure" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a situation or problem related to redundant or overlapping infrastructural elements. As seen in Ludwig, the phrase describes an inefficiency or a strategic choice to replicate existing systems.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "duplication of infrastructure" is a noun phrase used to denote the redundant replication of infrastructural elements. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is grammatically correct and usable, although relatively rare. Its primary function is to identify inefficiencies or strategic choices related to resource allocation in systems and projects. While understandable across various domains, it's crucial to specify the type of infrastructure and the implications of its duplication to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases include ""infrastructure redundancy"" and "replication of infrastructure", each carrying slightly different nuances. Common errors involve failing to explain the consequences of duplication. Best practices include specifying the infrastructure type for context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Infrastructure duplication

Reverses the order of words to change emphasis, but keeps the same meaning.

Replication of infrastructure

Uses "replication" instead of "duplication", implying a more intentional and systematic copying.

Infrastructure redundancy

Focuses on the presence of redundant infrastructure, emphasizing the state rather than the act of duplication.

Overlapping infrastructure

Highlights the overlapping nature of infrastructure components, suggesting inefficiency.

Duplicated infrastructural assets

Replaces "infrastructure" with "infrastructural assets" for a more formal tone.

Redundant infrastructure development

Emphasizes the development aspect, specifying that the infrastructure being developed is redundant.

Parallel infrastructure systems

Suggests entire systems operating in parallel which serve the same purpose, implying redundancy.

Unnecessary infrastructure overlap

Adds the element of necessity, indicating that the overlapping infrastructure is not required.

Wasteful infrastructure replication

Highlights the wasteful aspect of infrastructure replication.

Superfluous infrastructure

Replaces "duplication" with "superfluous", emphasizing that the infrastructure is excessive and unnecessary.

FAQs

What does "duplication of infrastructure" mean?

It refers to the unnecessary replication of essential facilities and systems, such as roads, power grids, or IT networks, which can lead to wasted resources and inefficiency.

How does "replication of infrastructure" differ from "duplication of infrastructure"?

While similar, "replication of infrastructure" often implies a more intentional or systematic copying process, whereas "duplication" might suggest redundancy that arose unintentionally.

What are the negative consequences of "duplication of infrastructure"?

The main drawbacks include increased costs, inefficient resource allocation, and potential operational complexities. Eliminating "infrastructure redundancy" can lead to significant savings.

In what contexts might "duplication of infrastructure" be acceptable or even beneficial?

In certain critical systems, such as emergency services or data backup, a degree of "infrastructure redundancy" may be necessary to ensure reliability and prevent service disruptions.