duplicated references

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "duplicated references" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where there are multiple instances of the same reference in a document or list, often in academic or technical writing. Example: "The report contained duplicated references, which made it difficult to determine the original sources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

After duplicated references had been discarded, 45 papers were reviewed, with 25 papers that fulfilled the inclusion criteria being identified.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The results of the investigation showed that the different databases found both unique citations and duplicated references.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

We retrieved 108 studies for more detailed analysis, and excluded 86 of these because they were not RCTs, they did not evaluate PT or ST in critically ill patients, they were duplicated references, or they were not relevant.

Critical Care

Two reviewers (CCW and HML) independently screened and decided the inclusion of the studies in the review after removing duplicated references.

Annals of Intensive Care

After exclusion of the duplicated references, both reviewers (SvN and SH) read 18 titles and abstracts.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

If a File Import Duplicate References Report appears, review it by scrolling through the list, or copy the report to the clipboard for pasting into a text editor like Pages.

Columbia University

Among them, 44 duplicate references were found.

Progress in Orthodontics

Duplicate references were taken off, and a total of 851 citations were carefully checked.

Progress in Orthodontics

After the centralization of the information returned from the search databases, duplicate references were removed.

Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society

14 0 57 Gross total references 20338 Gross total references 2758 155 57 Duplicates 1547 Duplicate references 18 14 0 Net total references from MEDLINE 18791 Net total references 2395 141 57 All references Identified         21384.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

From the potentially relevant references, 1771 duplicate references were removed, leaving a total of 8367 records to be screened by title, study design and abstract content.

Injury Epidemiology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When conducting systematic reviews, use reference management software to identify and remove "duplicated references" before screening for eligibility.

Common error

Ensure that references flagged as "duplicates" are truly identical. Sometimes, minor variations in titles or publication dates can indicate distinct, but related, sources. Always manually verify before deleting.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "duplicated references" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to identify and describe instances where the same bibliographic entry appears multiple times within a document or database. Ludwig confirms this usage through various examples.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

Academia

20%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "duplicated references" is a grammatically sound and understandable term, according to Ludwig, primarily employed within academic and scientific writing. It serves to denote the presence of identical references occurring multiple times in a document or database. When writing, ensure that you're accurately identifying true duplicates and using reference management tools to streamline your work. Common alternatives include "repeated citations" and "redundant references", though the original phrase is perfectly acceptable.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

repeated citations

Replaces "references" with "citations", emphasizing the act of citing rather than the references themselves.

redundant references

Substitutes "duplicated" with "redundant", highlighting the unnecessary repetition of the references.

duplicate entries

Focuses on the entries in a list or database that are duplicates, rather than the references themselves.

identical references

Emphasizes the sameness of the references using "identical" instead of "duplicated".

multiple instances of the same reference

A more descriptive phrase that explicitly states that the same reference appears multiple times.

replicated references

Uses "replicated" to convey the idea that the references have been copied or reproduced.

copied references

Emphasizes that the references have been copied. It can be used when there are many copied references

references appearing more than once

Highlights that the reference list contains some citation that appeared multiple times

superfluous references

Indicates that the references are excessive and unnecessary.

unnecessary references

Highlights that the references are not mandatory in the specific section

FAQs

How do I identify "duplicated references" in my research?

Use reference management software like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley. These tools have built-in functions to detect and remove duplicate entries based on bibliographic information.

What's the difference between "repeated citations" and "duplicated references"?

While similar, "repeated citations" emphasizes the act of citing, whereas "duplicated references" refers to the presence of the same reference entry multiple times in a list or document. The terms are often interchangeable.

What should I do after removing "duplicated references" from my search results?

After removing "duplicated references", carefully screen the remaining references for relevance to your research topic. This involves reviewing titles, abstracts, and full texts to determine if they meet your inclusion criteria.

Are "redundant references" always a problem in academic writing?

Yes, "redundant references" can clutter your work and suggest a lack of precision in your literature review. It is important to only cite sources that directly support your claims.