duplicate for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "duplicate for" is not a correct or usable part of a sentence in written English.
A correct phrase to use might be "duplicate of," or "copy of." For example, "I need a duplicate of this document for my records."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A middle ground is to do more to duplicate for disadvantaged pupils the home aid that middle-class children get.

The New York Times

TLC detection was performed in duplicate for all samples.

AMB Express

The lipid content was measured in duplicate for each sample.

Chemistry Central Journal

Measurements were made in duplicate for each analysis.

International Aquatic Research

All the experiments were performed in duplicate for each dose.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The measurements were carried out in duplicate for each sample.

Chemistry Central Journal

The drying process was performed in duplicate for each drying method.

Chemistry Central Journal

Samples were taken every 2 h and analysed in duplicate for size distribution.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

At AnaMar AB, all the samples were tested in duplicate for COMP and CILP-2.

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

Cultures were made in duplicate for each hippocampus.

Plosone

Each sample was plated in duplicate for each time point.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "duplicate of" instead of "duplicate for" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example, "Please provide a duplicate of your passport" is correct.

Common error

Avoid using "for" when you mean "of" in the context of creating copies. "Duplicate of" specifies what something is a copy of, whereas "for" indicates purpose or recipient, which doesn't fit the context of replication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "duplicate for" is generally incorrect as it doesn't serve a standard grammatical function in English. While it appears in various contexts, its use is often a mistake for phrases like "duplicate of". Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "duplicate for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in English. The intended meaning is typically to indicate a copy or replication, but the correct and accepted phrasing is "duplicate of". Ludwig AI highlights that, while examples of "duplicate for" exist, these are generally considered errors. Therefore, it's essential to use "duplicate of" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity in both formal and informal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

duplicate of

Replaces "for" with "of" to create a grammatically correct prepositional phrase indicating a copy or replica.

copy of

Offers a simpler, more common alternative to "duplicate", maintaining the sense of replication.

replicate

Uses "replicate" as a verb, changing the structure to focus on the action of copying.

reproduce

Similar to replicate, focusing on the act of creating a copy.

make a copy of

More explicit, clarifying the action of creating a copy.

create a duplicate of

A more formal way of expressing the same idea as "make a copy of".

mirror

Suggests an exact copy or reflection, implying similarity.

clone

Implies an identical copy, often used in scientific contexts.

emulate

Focuses on imitating or matching something, rather than creating an exact copy.

simulate

Suggests creating something that resembles the original, but may not be identical.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "duplicate" in a sentence?

The correct phrasing is "duplicate of" not "duplicate for". For example, say "This is a "duplicate of" the original document."

What can I say instead of "duplicate for"?

You can use phrases like ""duplicate of"", "copy of", or "replicate" depending on the specific context.

Is "duplicate for" grammatically correct?

No, "duplicate for" is not grammatically correct. The correct form is "duplicate of". Using "for" in this context is a common error. Consider using alternatives like "copy of".

How does the meaning change if I use "duplicate of" instead of "duplicate for"?

Using "duplicate of" makes the sentence grammatically correct and clear. "Duplicate for" is not a standard English phrase and could be confusing. "Duplicate of" clearly indicates that one thing is a copy of another.