Due to laboratory operator variation, the data for dose 4 were deemed to be inconsistent with the remaining data and excluded from analysis.
Outlier trials consisted again of less than 2% of the remaining data, and lost trials due to Wiimote pairing less than 4%.
Zablotska et al (2014) conclude that the finding for the early AECL workers is likely to be due to remaining data inaccuracies, probably missing dose information, rather than a real effect of radiation exposure, and they believe that use of the pre-1965 AECL worker data cannot be justified until further investigation is undertaken.
Experts were due to analyze remaining data from other flight recorders later today.
However, the results remain inconclusive due to the limited data available.
After full-text reading of the remaining 20 records, 8 of them were rejected due to the unavailable data.
Furthermore, the individual decisions of the emergency physician remain unclear due to the lack of data in the trauma register.
Until now, the genetic factors underlying the divergence between grain aphid and pea aphid still remain unclear due to the limited genomic data of grain aphid available in public databases.
Due to the nature of data mining, it always was.
However, due to the results of the remaining four patients' recorded data (non-severe patients all scored 0 points, n = 3; severe patient scored 2 points [CURSI/CURASI] and 3 points [CURB-65], n = 1) these patients were confirmed in the groups they were originally allocated, irrespective of any absent values.
Although the genome database is easily accessible for genome research, data analysis and interpretation still remain challenging due to the amount of sequence data and various research areas within genomics.
