Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

due to the lack of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "due to the lack of" is correct and usable in written English.
You would typically use this phrase to explain why something did or did not happen. For example: "The project was not completed on time due to the lack of resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It is probably due to the lack of added sugars.

This is often due to the lack of adequate methodologies.

Other companies besides Dell have been hit due to the lack of a successful tablet strategy.

The problem with contentEditable is its ambiguity due to the lack of standards.

News & Media

The Guardian

Part of the confusion was due to the lack of well-dated fossil and archaeological evidence.

News & Media

The Guardian

There was a double dose of Labour bashing, due to the lack of Tory bashing.

Asked if they were replaced due to the lack of offensive pressing, he replied: "No.

Many did not have formal schooling beyond a primary education due to the lack of funds.

I know it's impossible to hear audible sound in space due to the lack of air.

Due to the lack of water supply it has not yet been put into operation.

It is about 90 degrees outside, and possibly hotter inside, due to the lack of AC.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

For formal writing, consider stronger and more direct causal connectors, such as "because" or "since", to enhance clarity and conciseness. However, "due to the lack of" is perfectly acceptable and understood in most contexts.

Common error

Avoid attributing actions or states directly to people using "due to the lack of". It's more appropriate to say someone failed because they didn't prepare, not due to the lack of preparation, which sounds awkward and indirect.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "due to the lack of" functions as a causal connector, linking a result or effect to the absence of something. Ludwig provides numerous examples where this phrase introduces the reason for a particular outcome or situation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Academia

33%

Science

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "due to the lack of" is a common and grammatically correct causal connector used to explain why something happened or didn't happen, stemming from the absence of something necessary. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is widely accepted and usable in written English. It appears frequently in News & Media, Academia, and Scientific contexts. While generally neutral in tone, more formal writing may benefit from stronger causal connectors. Remember to use "due to the lack of" when a lack is the direct cause and avoid misattributing actions to people in this way.

FAQs

How can I use "due to the lack of" in a sentence?

Use "due to the lack of" to explain a consequence resulting from something being absent. For example, "The experiment failed "due to the lack of funding"".

What are some alternatives to "due to the lack of"?

Alternatives include phrases like "owing to the absence of", "because of insufficient", or "as a result of inadequate" depending on the context.

Is it correct to use "due to the lack of" in formal writing?

Yes, "due to the lack of" is generally acceptable in formal writing. However, consider stronger and more concise alternatives like "because of" or "since" if appropriate for your context.

What's the difference between "due to" and "because of"?

"Due to" should technically only be used when it can replace "caused by" as an adjective, while "because of" functions as an adverbial phrase. However, this distinction is often blurred in modern usage, and both are generally acceptable. For example, "The cancellation was "due to" the weather" vs. "The game was cancelled because of the weather".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: