These conflicting reports on primary tumor vascularity and prognosis might be due to methodological differences, different study cohort or biological factors [ 6, 19, 20].
Drawing comparisons with other jurisdictions is challenging due to methodological differences, such as different study populations and unknown or varied thresholds used to define immune status.
These differing findings may be due to methodological differences between the studies, such as length of time in deprivation and statistical control for suggestibility and fantasy proneness.
Also, due to methodological differences, the impacts they intend to capture are different.
Part of the difference in values may be due to methodological differences in the surveys.
Alternatively, they may be due to methodological differences, including study design and response/relapse definitions.
In addition, results of available neuroimaging studies of grammatical morphology vary considerably due to methodological differences.
At the present, it will be difficult to determine whether these observations are real or due to methodological differences in the studies.
First, primary studies in economics usually employ a variety of data and statistical methods, which results in a dispersion of estimates due to methodological differences.
The discrepancies might be due to methodological differences, which make it difficult to compare gait analysis results across studies (Fuentes et al., 2011, Zabala et al., 2015).
The findings are far from clear-cut due to methodological differences, and as the results are context sensitive they cannot easily be transferred between countries.
