due to less of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "due to less of" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express a decrease or reduction in something. Example: "The project was delayed due to less of available resources."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Taken together, these results suggested that even though KLΔ9 showed a normal distribution similar to that of KL WT, it has less cell-surface distribution compared to that of KL WT, likely due to less of the mutant protein being targeted to the plasma membrane.

Biochemistry

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

This is partially explained by lower digestibility of starter due to less development of the rumen at and after weaning; however, it is unclear when digestibility matures postweaning to levels typical of mature ruminants.

Journal of Dairy Science

This finding is probably due to less control of this new type of ventilation compared with PSV, which is the reference mode.

BMC Anesthesiology

The high-strength properties of UHPC allow the design of slender structures, leading to reduction in self-weight of the structure due to less use of materials.

International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials

In addition, soil structural improvement may occur due to less clogging of pores by the reorganization of the dispersed clay (Spera et al. 2008).

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

This is due to less acceptance of new technology and lack of technical expertise.

BioMed Research International

One may speculate that this increase is due to less clearance of adiponectin in the liver of patients with cirrhosis.

Clinical Science

RNO5q32 loss was not detected by M-CGH due to less sensitivity of this technique in detection of segmental losses [ 34].

BMC Cancer

Increasing the parameter for proteasome activity, k69, leads to more degradation and less ubiquitin conjugates, whereas decreasing k69 has the opposite effect and also results in depletion of monomeric ubiquitin due to less recycling of ubiquitin.

BMC Systems Biology

This behavior of magnetic field is obtained due to less compression of magnetic flux which leads to decrease in magnetic field h′.

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics

However, the tensile and flexural strength decreased with increased loading of BQASMMT18 from 3%to5wt wt% due to less dispersibility of organoclay in nanocomposites.

Polymer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating causation related to quantity or amount, replace "due to less of" with more grammatically sound alternatives such as "due to a lack of" or "because of insufficient". This enhances clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "less" for countable nouns. "Less" should be used with non-countable nouns. For countable nouns, use "fewer". For example, instead of "due to less errors", use "due to fewer errors" or "due to a lower number of errors".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "due to less of" functions as a causal connector, attempting to explain the reason or cause behind a particular outcome. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect, and it is advisable to use alternatives for clearer communication.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "due to less of" functions as a causal connector, attempting to explain the reason or cause behind a particular outcome. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect, and it is advisable to use alternatives for clearer communication. The phrase is rare and should be avoided in favor of grammatically sound options like "due to a lack of" or "because of insufficient". Remember that in contexts where countability matters, it's essential to use "fewer" instead of "less". Using correct grammar will enhance the clarity and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

due to a lack of

Replaces "less of" with "a lack of" for grammatical correctness.

because of insufficient

Substitutes "due to" with "because of" and uses "insufficient" to replace "less of" indicating inadequacy.

because there is less

A more direct and grammatically sound way of expressing the original meaning.

owing to a deficiency in

Replaces "due to" with "owing to" and uses "deficiency in" to convey the meaning of less quantity or quality.

as a result of decreased

Uses "as a result of" to indicate cause and effect, with "decreased" quantifying the reduction.

attributable to reduced

Formally attributes the outcome to a reduction in something.

caused by a smaller amount of

Directly states the cause as being a smaller quantity.

stemming from diminished

Indicates that the result originates from something that has been diminished.

arising from a scarcity of

Points to a lack of something as the origin of the effect.

on account of a shortage of

Uses "on account of" to introduce the reason, highlighting a shortage.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically correct way to say "due to less of"?

Instead of "due to less of", you can use phrases like "due to a lack of", "because of insufficient", or "owing to a deficiency in" depending on the context.

Is "due to less of" considered formal English?

No, "due to less of" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in formal English. It's best to use more precise and standard alternatives in formal writing and speech.

Can I use "due to less of" in scientific writing?

While some instances of "due to less of" may appear in scientific literature, it's advisable to use more grammatically correct alternatives to maintain clarity and credibility. Consider using "due to a lack of" or "because there is less".

What's the difference between "due to less of" and "due to fewer of"?

"Less" should be used with non-countable nouns, while "fewer" is used with countable nouns. Since "due to less of" is already grammatically questionable, avoid it altogether. If you're referring to something countable, use "due to fewer". If it's non-countable, try "due to a lack of".