However, multivariate linear regression analysis revealed significant differences in mean scores of several subscales with regard to patient age, education level, number of QDU visits, and a diagnosis of malignant vs. benign condition, after due adjustment.
Similarly, the attenuation of the caffeine effect on SIF14LED 456 nm[0.8] 0.8] was due to adjustments for age and smoking status as well as EDIC HbA1c (β±SE, 0.00035±0.00003; P=1.6×10−30, without adjustments for age, smoking status, and HbA1c).
These differences in gas exchange disappeared during the experiment due to adjustments in respiratory rates.
This could be due to adjustments in the experimental designs (e.g., testing immediately after exercise, employing stimuli other than faces, and testing within-subjects).
This is believed to occur due to adjustments made in the visual system.
The consistency of shape throughout Experiments A and B adds validity to the notion that differences between the two experiments are due to adjustments in stimulus saliency and not simply to random differences in participant characteristics.
It could be due to adjustments not including risk factors associated with perineal tears.
Species-level identification based on PNA-FISH could contribute to notable cost savings due to adjustments in empiric antimicrobial or antifungal therapy as appropriate to the pathogen identified.
96.1% and 95.89% confidence intervals were used for estimates of HPV-16/18 HPV-16/18d vassociatedicacy for Cervaccineand Gardasil®, refficacyely, due to adjustments for multipliCervarix
The attenuation of the relative risk estimates in the adjusted analysis was almost entirely due to adjustment for active smoking.
