'dual stimulus' is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe two stimuli acting together in order to elicit a response. For example, “The experiment revealed that a dual stimulus of sugar and water was necessary to produce an appetitive reaction in the mice.”.
Dual stimulus responsive micelles were prepared by the self-assembly of PCL-SS-PDMAEMA.
Liu et al. have developed a [2]pseudorotaxane with a dual stimulus luminescent lanthanide switch using a diarylperfluorocyclopentene as the photochromic component.
Activation with both RANKL and LTB4 achieved more TRAP+ multinucleated cells, as well as more cells fluxing calcium, in response to the dual stimulus.
An alternative explanation is that our concurrent presentation may have emphasised differences in salience and attentional resources within and across sensory modalities during dual stimulus presentations.
Swelling measurements of hydrogels indicated sensitivity to temperature and pH, suggesting that the P[NIPAAm-co-CAA-TPP]s were temperature/pH dual stimulus-responsive hydrogels.
This reaction mechanism is important for the dismantling adhesion system in response to the dual stimuli.
In contrast, the nanocapsule comprising the wild-type Hsp16.5 was not influenced by the dual stimuli.
Drug release from the nanoplexes was significantly enhanced at low pH (5) and in the presence of 10 mM glutathione (GSH) showing their dual stimuli sensitive nature.
Furthermore, MLMP (DOX) exhibited outstanding tumor inhibition capability with non-toxicity compared to free DOX, indicating that dual stimuli-MLMP has great potential as an anticancer drug delivery platform.
This superior anti-tumor efficacy of FA/DOX micelles in MDR tumor-bearing mice can be attributed to FA-targeted and -mediated endocytosis, inhibition of MDR effect, and subsequent DOX release triggered by dual stimuli (low pH and redox) inside the tumor.
Spinal cord tissues were stimulated by dual stimuli with various interval times, ranging from 0.5 to 15 ms. The absolute refractory periods (interval time that second peak starts to appear) for pre-stimulation, post-stimulation and 4-AP treatment were 0.83±0.10, 0.85±0.06, and 0.88±0.05, respectively, with no significant difference (p>0.05).
