Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(26)
Patterson [37] did not list specific inclusion criteria, but compared dry gauze changed twice daily, dry gauze changed only when appearing soiled, and Xeroform dressings changed twice daily.
Camilo et al. [4] studied polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine-soaked gauze versus dry gauze in the setting of Ilizarov external fixators.
Standard pin care with possible showering and application of dry gauze around the pins was recommended [13, 16].
Human hypertrophic scar tissue was immersed in pH 7.4 PBS at 25 °C for 2 h, and the water on tissue surface was removed gently with dry gauze.
Despite this, the authors were concluded the combination of half-strength hydrogen peroxide with Xeroform dressings was superior to soap and water cleansing with dry gauze.
After eliminating the red blood cell (RBC) fractions, the resulting A-PRF and CGF clots were placed on dry gauze to eliminate excess amounts of serum (~10 s) and then transferred to freezing tubes for determination of growth factor contents.
Similar(34)
The obtained specimens were immediately removed from the subcutaneous tissue, protected the epidermis, made into a thickness of 4.0 mm, an area of 3 cm × 3 cm scar tissue samples, washed with saline at room temperature, dried with gauze dry surface moisture, wrapped with aluminum foil, and stored in a refrigerator at − 20 °C.
We compared the incidence of PTI between group A (dry sterile gauze dressing) and group B (1 % silver sulphadiazine impregnated gauze dressing).
Dry sterile gauze is wrapped around each pin site.
Injection sites were wiped with 70%% ethanol swab, and dry sterile gauze for skin preparation and aspirations were performed before each injection.
This study was designed to assess the efficacy of silver sulphadiazine dressings in the prevention of PTI by comparing the incidence of infection in a group dressed with 1 % silver sulphadiazine to another dressed with dry sterile gauze.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com