Suggestions(5)
Exact(35)
Intention and behavioural prepotency directly predicted heavy episodic drinking (p < 0.01).
Binge drinking (p = 0.02) and opiate use (p = 0.02) had differential effects on substance use consequences by risk of SMI.
In experiment 1, cows took more sips (P < 0.01), spent more time drinking (P < 0.01) and drank more water (P < 0.01) from the trough with larger surface area.
Social hierarchy did not influence drinking behaviour when the water trough was placed inside the paddock (P = 0.3); however, when the water trough was located in the corridor, the number of drinking events (P = 0.05) and the time spent drinking (P = 0.05) were greater for dominant cows in comparison to subordinate cows.
In experiment 2, cows took more sips from the higher than from the lower trough (P < 0.02) and showed a tendency to consume more water (P = 0.08) and to spend more time drinking (P = 0.08) from the higher than from the lower trough.
There was a synergistic interaction between the A1298C polymorphism and drinking (P < 0.05).
Similar(25)
Most notable were effects with a history of binge drinking (OR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.6 7.5) including increased number of drinks per day (p-trend = 0.002), and increased years of binge drinking (p-trend = 0.0006).
The chi-squared test was used to examine the associations between sample characteristics or the type of friends and binge drinking (p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant).
The chi-squared test was used to study the associations of sample characteristics or the type of friends and binge drinking (p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant).
There was an indication of an association between increased levels of osteocalcin and uranium concentrations in drinking water (p = 0.19; p-value in the conventional linear regression was 0.04).
As with BUA, drinking milk (P = 0.007) and not having heard of osteoporosis (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher SOS.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com