Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(33)
"A drinking group with a singing problem," Mr. Lewellyn added.
DM prevalence was 9.0% and 5.7% in the low-risk drinking group, 7.6% and 4.1% in the intermediate-risk drinking group, and 11.2% and 3.5% in the high-risk drinking group in men and women, respectively.
Adolescent rats assigned to the drinking group had access to the stuff for 20 days.
Compared to the low-risk drinking group, odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of men and women in the intermediate-risk drinking group for DM were 1.043 (0.779 1.396) and 1.139 (0.712 1.824), respectively, and 1.480 (1.133 1.933) and 0.827 (0.296 2.311) in the high-risk drinking group, after adjusting for age and other confounding factors.
Age-adjusted hypertension prevalence was 30.8, 40.9, and 45.3% in men, and 24.6, 27.0, and 32.3% in women in the low-, intermediand-, and high-risk drinking group, respectively.
Compared to the low-risk drinking group, the prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) for hypertension was 1.664 (1.4331.933) and 2.070 (1.772 2.418) for men and 1.012 (0.774 1.323) and 1.650 (1.080 2.522) for women in the intermediate- and high-risk drinking group, respectively, after adjusting for age and other confounding factors.
Similar(27)
If we despair of all-male drinking groups at university, then we definitely shouldn't be allowing them in the office.
To examine the potential confounding effect of concomitant ethanol consumption on elicited manic-like behaviors or the possibility that differences in behaviors could have resulted from differential ethanol intake between the groups, we compared manic-like behaviors between two LHK groups, water only and ethanol (20% v/v versus water) drinking groups (n = 8 each).
The differences between control and ethanol drinking groups were analyzed by a Student t test.
Within the alcohol drinking groups, there was a weak tendency for elevated γ-GT concentrations with high smoking intensity, but the patterns were not entirely consistent.
To summarize the above interactions in a more palatable way, we fitted smoking trend models allowing an interaction of smoking intensity with alcohol drinking groups or BMI.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com