The phrase "draw the inference that" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to indicate that a conclusion or judgment is being made based on evidence or reasoning.
Example: "From the data presented, we can draw the inference that the new marketing strategy is effective."
Alternatives: "conclude that" or "infer that".
"You can reasonably draw the inference that what was going to happen was the crime of kidnapping".
The court, he added, might draw the inference that there had been a "cover up" by the police.
To saddle the defendant with liability where the loss of profit is due to special circumstances the court must be able to draw the inference that those circumstances have been brought to the notice of the defendant.
The present law requires courts to impose drastic limitations on the freedoms of these loyal fans if they make a single mistake which allows the police to draw the inference that these "risk" fans are acting together to encourage each other into further acts of violence and disorder.
It clearly reflects on the judge who was permitting or participating in these 'shocking and horrible' things; at the lowest it allows the inference to be drawn, as the Hawaii Supreme Court did draw the inference, that she did so reflect.
Considering other techniques like whitening pre-processing can affect the distribution of features activations, we can draw the inference that whitening transformation indirectly influences the selection of pooling methods.
"The jury would not have acted irrationally had it drawn the inference that the e-mails were fakes," Judge McMahon wrote.
Because J. C. Penney didn't produce any of these opinions, I'm drawing the inference that it didn't provide the unqualified go-ahead that Mr. Johnson wanted.
"I think people were drawing the inference that perhaps because of [opposition leader] Bill Shorten's scare campaign through the greengrocery aisles of Australia that we had actually made a decision to change the GST and we had not," he said.
Noticing this distinction, he also notes the fact that a contest in respect to the validity of a patent for agricultural lands can be litigated in the Federal courts, and hence draws the inference that a contest preliminary to a patent for mineral lands, and involving the right thereto, must also be one which can be litigated in the same courts.
In drawing the inference that the Constitution has committed final interpretive authority to one of the political branches, courts are sometimes aided by textual evidence that the judiciary was not meant to exercise judicial reviewa coordinate inquiry expressed in Baker's "lack of judicially discoverable and manageable standards" criterion.
