Exact(60)
For the second drag model, we obtain.
According to the first drag model, we get.
The results turn out this way simply because of the particular drag model being used.
The results were explained by the solute drag model.
A cavity drag model was used to explain the results.
Depending on drag model utilized, the drag power may be greater than muscle power without being paradoxical.
Compared to the standard drag model, the filtered drag model with two markers not only predicted reasonable bed expansion but also yielded realistic bubbling behavior.
Numerical simulations were performed with the k-epsilon turbulence model and the Gidaspow drag model.
Besides, minor modifications to the wall friction model and bubbly-slug interfacial drag model were done.
The latest filtered sub-grid drag model was then tested in the numerical simulations.
The comparative study with regard to turbulence and drag model was performed by 2D simulation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com