The content can be summarised as knowledge of CAD tools for generating, editing and sharing engineering drawings, as well as the development of technical drawings with the 2D drafting module of a widely used commercial CAD system.
The initial PedsQL™ EoE Module draft included an activities and school domain.
Participants also provided feedback on the overall rationale and disease-relevance of the PedsQL™ EoE Module draft.
Draft PedsQL™ EoE Module items were developed from 42 transcripts of 18 child and 24 parent individual focus interviews.
Participants completed the draft PedsQL™ EoE Module instrument and then provided feedback employing the previously described respondent debriefing methodology (see Table 1) [ 16, 17, 21].
Items generated by individual focus interview participants and national experts were used to create a draft PedsQL™ EoE Module, utilizing a protocol from the existing methodological literature [ 21].
In the first PedsQL™ EoE Module draft, difficulties with going to the doctor or hospital were described in a single question.
We would also like to acknowledge national EoE experts Seema Aceves, MD, PhD, Glenn Furuta, MD, Mary Klinnert, PhD, Jonathan Spergel, MD, PhD and Sandeep Gupta, MD for their thoughtful review of the PedsQL™ EoE Module draft items.
In the cognitive interviewing phase for the current study, the updated draft PedsQL™ EoE Module was reviewed by a unique cohort of 17 children with EoE and 27 parents of children with EoE who were not participants in the previous focus interviews [ 4].
Problems following the diet was captured in the module draft with the two items "It is hard not being allowed to eat some foods" and "I wish I could eat certain things, but can't," and the latter question was removed because many children found the two items similar.
