double-check

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "double-check" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to emphasize the importance of verifying something again to ensure accuracy. Example: "Before submitting the report, please double-check all the figures to avoid any mistakes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

I'll double-check.

The Guardian

We double-check our sources.

The New York Times - Magazine

Always double-check URLS.

Huffington Post

Double-check companies.

WikiHow

Double-check the dryer.

WikiHow

Double-check your work.

WikiHow

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Check, double check.

The New York Times - Books

Double check everything.

The Guardian

Check, check, and double check.

Independent

Southwestern-rustic? Double check.

Huffington Post

Inconsistent content… double check.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing instructions or procedures, use "double-check" to emphasize the critical steps that require extra attention to avoid errors.

Common error

While "double-check" is versatile, avoid using it excessively in casual conversations where simpler alternatives like "check again" would suffice. Overuse can make your speech sound overly cautious or pedantic.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "double-check" is as a verb, indicating the act of verifying something again. Ludwig AI examples show it used in imperative sentences to give instructions or suggestions.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Wiki

60%

News & Media

30%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "double-check" is a versatile and grammatically sound verb used to emphasize the importance of verifying information again. Ludwig AI indicates that it is a common term found in various contexts, including wiki articles, news media, and scientific publications. While it is generally safe to use in both formal and informal settings, being mindful of overuse in casual conversations is advisable. Alternatives such as "verify again" or "reconfirm" may be more suitable depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verify again

Simple rephrasing that replaces a compound verb with a more straightforward alternative.

reconfirm

Emphasizes confirming something for a second time, suitable for formal contexts.

cross-verify

Suggests checking against another source or piece of information.

check again

A more basic and direct way to say the same thing.

validate once more

More formal, suitable when emphasizing the importance of validation.

review thoroughly

Focuses on the depth of the second check, suggesting a detailed examination.

go over again

A more casual way to suggest reviewing something one more time.

ensure accuracy

Shifts the focus to the goal of the re-check, emphasizing precision.

reexamine

Highlights the action of examining again, often implying a careful look.

give a second look

An idiomatic way of saying to check something again.

FAQs

How do I use "double-check" in a sentence?

"Double-check" is a verb, so you can use it like any other verb. For example, "Please double-check the figures before submitting the report."

What can I say instead of "double-check"?

You can use alternatives like "verify again", "reconfirm", or "check again" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "double-check"?

It's appropriate to use "double-check" when you want to emphasize the importance of verifying something a second time to ensure accuracy and prevent errors, especially in formal instructions or procedures.

Is "double check" or "double-check" correct?

"Double-check" is the correct spelling when used as a verb or a noun. "Double check" (two words) is less common, but might be seen in some contexts.