Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The article asks us to peer beyond scientific reticence into a doomsday future.
Out of all of these seemingly reasonable and possible futures — and one could go on and on — there does not appear to be any reason to give preference to the doomsday future.
It is truly a time to find spiritual unity or we may just inherit a doomsday future instead of a positive one.
Similar(57)
Even though this mini-doomsday future landscape seems almost un-American, I think this is a reasonably good case scenario in view of pending events.
"It's not doomsday".
"It's not doomsday," Sauerbeck said.
Fairyland or doomsday?
Hurricane Sandy today, doomsday for America tomorrow?
But over and over again, Secretary of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and the assembled members of Congress spun implausible doomsday scenarios of future chemical attacks on American troops or civilians, or implied that the intervention was motivated by the ongoing massacre and would, somehow, stop it.
The last list is a summary of more grounded perceived threats/risks, i.e. those that don't focus on the stereotypical doomsday scenario of future 'superintelligent machines' judging humans a waste of planetary space, but which are again focused on risks associated with the kind of narrow but proliferating — in terms of applications and usage — 'AI' we do already have.
It's easy to gush about the wonders of tech's open pastures, or tougher to diametrically write existentially about future doomsday scenarios, which I admit is much easier for me.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com