Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
Note that in Theorems A and B, Eq. (1.2) has only one dominating coefficient a l.
For the case when there is no dominating coefficient and all coefficients are polynomials in Eq. (1.2), Chen [10] obtained an improvement of Theorem A.
Another question raised by Laine and Yang in [16] is whether all meromorphic solutions f ( z ) of (1.1) satisfy ρ ( f ) ≥ max 0 ≤ j ≤ n ρ ( A j ) + 1, even if there is no dominating coefficient.
If the dominating coefficient M is 1, then END random variables reduce to NOD random variables which contain NA random variables and NSD random variables (see Joag-Dev and Proschan [2], Hu [3] and Wang et al. [4]).
In Theorems B and C, there is always some dominating coefficient A l such that ρ ( A l ) > 0. A natural question is what happens if the dominating coefficient A l is of order zero?
end{aligned} Therefore, it can be found that ({Z_{n},ngeq1}) is also an END sequence with the same dominating coefficient M. Shen [10].
Similar(53)
(i) Let a random sequence ({X_{n}, ngeq1 }) be WOD with dominating coefficients (g(n)).
Let a random sequence ({X_{n}, ngeq1 }) be WOD with dominating coefficients (g(n)).
Let a random sequence ({ X_{n}, ngeq1 }) be WOD with dominating coefficients (g(n)), and let (A1)–(A3) hold true.
Let a random sequence ({X_{n}, ngeq1 }) be WOD with dominating coefficients (g(n)), and (EX_{i}=0), (|X_{i}|leq d), a.s.s
Assume that ({X_{i}, igeq1} ) are WUOD r.v.s with dominating coefficients (g_{U}(n) (nge1)) satisfying (2.1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com