dominant force in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "dominant force in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a person, group, or entity that has significant influence or control in a particular area or context. Example: "In the tech industry, Apple has been a dominant force in shaping consumer preferences and trends."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Formerly a dominant force in society".

The New York Times

The MQM, the dominant force in Karachi, has also suffered.

The Guardian

Amazon is now the dominant force in bookselling.

The Washington Post

ConAtitution to be come a dominant force in.

The New York Times

But Reggie Walton was the dominant force in the courtroom.

The New York Times

He said: "Asil Nadir was the dominant force in PPI.

Independent

Photographers have long been a dominant force in Yosemite Valley.

The New York Times

His party will remain the dominant force in Scottish politics.

The Economist

Overnight, a concept that Einstein had rejected was now considered the dominant force in the universe.

Stanford University

It is absolutely not the dominant force in Scotland and Wales that it used to be.

The Guardian

By the end of last year, pop rap was the dominant force in the British charts.

The Guardian - Music

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "dominant force in", ensure the context clearly defines the area or field where the dominance is exerted for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "dominant force in" when describing emerging trends or entities with limited proven influence. Ensure the claim is supported by evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dominant force in" typically functions as a noun phrase modifier, describing a subject's significant influence or control within a specific context. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

10%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Science

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "dominant force in" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to describe an entity wielding substantial influence or control. As indicated by Ludwig AI, its usage spans various contexts, including news, academia, and business. When employing this phrase, it's best to clearly define the context in which the dominance is asserted to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases such as "leading influence" or "major player" can be used to convey similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis. Overall, "dominant force in" is a versatile and effective way to communicate significant power dynamics.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

leading influence

Focuses on the power to guide or direct, rather than outright dominance.

major player

Emphasizes participation and importance in a field or market.

chief influence

Highlights the primary source of impact or control.

preeminent power

Stresses a superior level of authority or strength.

prevailing power

Indicates current or existing control over a situation.

reigning authority

Implies official or established command.

paramount influence

Highlights the supreme or highest impact.

principal authority

Focuses on being the main or leading source of power.

foremost influence

Emphasizes being at the front or head in terms of impact.

commanding presence

Stresses the visible and impactful nature of the influence.

FAQs

How can I use "dominant force in" in a sentence?

Use "dominant force in" to describe an entity that has a significant and controlling influence in a particular area. For example, "Amazon is the dominant force in online retail".

What are some alternatives to "dominant force in"?

You can use alternatives like "leading influence", "major player", or "chief influence" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "dominant force in" in formal writing?

Yes, "dominant force in" is suitable for formal writing, particularly in contexts such as business, news, and academic discussions. It clearly and effectively conveys the extent of influence or control.

What distinguishes "dominant force in" from "significant influence"?

"Dominant force in" suggests a controlling or leading position, whereas "significant influence" implies a notable impact without necessarily being the primary controller. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize leadership or just substantial impact.