Sentence examples for domain of concepts from inspiring English sources

Collingwood also characterises the intellect as the domain of concepts, and of generalisation (273, 281).

These general models include in the domain of concepts only enough concepts to make these instances of comprehension true.

Thus, Hume's Principle, unlike Basic Law V, does not require that the domain of numbers be as large as the domain of concepts.

Facts (2) – (4) establish that equinumerosity is an 'equivalence relation' which divides up the domain of concepts into 'equivalence classes' of equinumerous concepts.

Thus, the addition of Basic Law V to second-order logic implies an impossible situation in which the domain of concepts has to be strictly larger than the domain of extensions while at the same time the domain of extensions has to be as large as the domain of concepts.

Most philosophers and logicians agree that the reason second-order logic can't be extended by Basic Law V is that the resulting system requires the impossible situation in which the domain of concepts has to be strictly larger than the domain of extensions while at the same time the domain of extensions has to be as large as the domain of concepts.

But the argument also depends upon the thesis that the domain of behavior explicable in psychological terms extends further than the domain of concept possession and this in turn depends upon a substantive philosophical account of what it is to possess a concept.

Its first approach consists in hypothesizing a domain of "innate concepts" common to everyone (with certain qualifications, e.g. that these concepts require sensations in order to be actualized).

Children with greater adiposity also had lower scores for global self-concept and the intellectual and school domain of self-concept.

The domain of the concept of nature under the one legislation and that of the concept of freedom under the other are entirely barred from any mutual influence that they could have on each other by themselves (each in accordance with its fundamental laws) by the great chasm that separates the supersensible from the appearances" (5:195).

This means that the empirical and the moral domain of the concept cannot in fact be separated.