Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
It's encouraging that we find that doing good-quality science on a consistent basis multiple first-author papers in journals with reasonable IF does seem to be rewarded in the end.
Try to do good quality, fun, original ones!
Kind regards Sebastien Dear Sebastien Professor Bateson's systematic analysis shows that over 90% of the work covered did result in good quality science that was published in good scientific journals and well cited.
This did not restrict the submissions to fantasy or science fiction, and as a result Hersey received (and printed) all kinds of fiction, including mysteries, adventures, and love stories, though it may be that he simply did not receive enough good quality science fiction and fantasy to fill the magazine.
Readers will assume that a professional-looking manuscript contains good quality science.
More than that: It's doing good science.
Is doing good science possible in such an environment?
"India just can't grow without doing good science".
All that matters is doing good science, right?
We learned from our predecessors that doing good science does not require cutting-edge equipment.
They are doing good work on the science committee.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com