doing existed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "doing existed" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express a concept related to existence or action, but it lacks clarity and grammatical structure. Example: "The idea of doing existed long before we could articulate it."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

"None of the things I spent the last three days doing existed when I came into the business," he pointed out.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Such viruses do exist.

The Economist

So, it does exist.

The New York Times - Sports

Such people do exist.

The New York Times

Who now did exist.

The New Yorker

"Chernobyl does exist.

The New York Times

But references do exist.

The New York Times

Options do exist.

The New York Times

They did exist.

The New Yorker

They do exist.

The New York Times

Teen gurus do exist.

The New York Times - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "doing existed" in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "actions occurred" or "activities transpired".

Common error

Be mindful of tense consistency. The phrase "doing existed" mixes a present participle with a past tense verb. Ensure your verbs agree in tense for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "doing existed" attempts to function as a statement of past existence or action. However, the grammatical structure is flawed. Ludwig AI flags this as needing revision. The correct usage should employ a grammatically sound structure.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "doing existed" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. While the phrase attempts to convey the past existence of actions, its incorrect tense usage undermines its effectiveness. Instead, opt for grammatically sound alternatives such as "actions occurred" or "activities transpired". These alternatives provide clarity and maintain grammatical integrity. While there's limited use, the phrase appears in news and media contexts, it's crucial to prioritize grammatical accuracy for clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

events happened

This is a simple and direct way to state that events occurred.

actions occurred

This alternative replaces "doing existed" with a more grammatically sound phrase indicating that actions took place.

activities transpired

This uses more formal language to suggest that events or activities happened in the past.

deeds took place

This alternative emphasizes the performance of specific deeds or actions.

things were done

This passive construction highlights the completion of tasks or actions.

tasks were completed

This focuses on the successful completion of specific tasks.

operations unfolded

This alternative suggests a process or series of actions that developed over time.

work was performed

This emphasizes the execution of work or labor.

endeavors unfolded

This suggests that efforts or attempts took place.

undertakings materialized

This implies that projects or ventures came into being.

FAQs

What's a grammatically correct alternative to "doing existed"?

Instead of "doing existed", you can use phrases like "actions occurred", "activities transpired", or "events happened" depending on the context.

Is "doing existed" considered proper English?

No, "doing existed" is not considered proper English due to its incorrect tense usage. It's best to use grammatically correct alternatives.

How can I rephrase a sentence that includes "doing existed"?

Rephrase the sentence to use a past tense verb that accurately reflects the action. For example, instead of "The idea of doing existed", try "The idea of action "preceded us"".

What is the difference between "doing existed" and "actions occurred"?

"Doing existed" is grammatically incorrect, while "actions occurred" is a correct and clear way to express that actions happened in the past.