Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

dogs of one

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "dogs of one" is not correct or usable in written English.
It appears to be an incomplete or unclear expression that lacks context for proper usage. Example: "The dogs of one pack are known for their loyalty."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

On the Web site Open Left, the blogger Matt Stoller accused the Blue Dogs of one of their "standard betrayals".

News & Media

The New York Times

It is possible that CgA concentrations vary by breed, which could explain why the results of the present study, including results from many breeds, differed from the study that included only dogs of one breed (Beagle).

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

They even set loose dogs on one of my fellow Zanana.

From the dog of one patient, a fecal sample was collected and analyzed but no positive signal for HEV RNA was detected by RT-PCR.

All dogs were of one of three breeds: German Shepherd, Belgian Malinois, or Dutch Shepherd.

They're the "dogs of war," one of his finds in Cerro Azul a monumental painting 50 meters in length along the path neighboring Ruadal.

News & Media

Vice

Forty years later, three complete skeletons were found, along with the boots, watch, helmet liner, and dog tags of one of the soldiers.

News & Media

Huffington Post

An élite Vapor Wake dog—"They're like the Michael Jordans of dogs," one of the trainers told me.

News & Media

The New Yorker

In my last post, I opened a discussion on the emotional life of dogs, sharing one of my favorite books on the subject, Animals Make Us Human, by Temple Grandin.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Retrospective review of records from these dogs led to exclusion of one dog due to a final diagnosis of histiocytic ulcerative colitis.

"Why is there a coronavirus of chickens, and one of dogs, and one of rats, and why don't they infect each other?" Dr. Holmes asked.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing dogs, specify their breed, owner, or relationship to provide clarity. Avoid using the vague phrase "dogs of one".

Common error

Avoid using "dogs of one" without providing context about what 'one' refers to. It can be ambiguous. Instead, clearly state if you mean one breed, one owner, or one household.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dogs of one" functions as a prepositional phrase, but its grammatical role is often vague without additional context. As Ludwig AI points out, the phrase lacks clarity in many cases. It is not a standard grammatical construction.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "dogs of one" is an uncommon and often unclear way to refer to a group of dogs. Ludwig AI notes that its meaning is highly context-dependent. While it might be used informally, it's generally better to use more specific language to describe the shared characteristic, such as breed or ownership. Due to its vagueness, it is typically unsuitable for formal or academic writing.

FAQs

How can I describe dogs that share a common trait or origin?

Instead of "dogs of one", use phrases like "dogs of a single breed", "dogs from one owner", or "dogs sharing a common ancestry" for greater clarity.

Is "dogs of one" grammatically correct?

While not strictly incorrect, "dogs of one" is an uncommon and often unclear phrase. It's better to use more precise language to avoid ambiguity.

What does "dogs of one" even mean?

The meaning of "dogs of one" is highly context-dependent. It could refer to dogs of the same breed, dogs belonging to the same owner, or dogs from the same litter, among other possibilities.

Are there situations where the phrase "dogs of one" is acceptable?

In very specific contexts where the meaning is unambiguously clear, "dogs of one" might be acceptable. However, it's generally advisable to use more descriptive language to ensure understanding.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: