Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(13)
Carr and May (2000) flag that "assessment is the tail that wags the curriculum dog" (p. 14).
Having never handled an ill prairie dog (p = 0.004) was protective.
However, there was a significant interaction between cestode infection and the use of dog (P < 0.01).
The only factor protective against MPXV infection (Table 2) was never having handled an ill prairie dog (p = 0.004).
When the dog was present, only pregnant goats climbed, at a rate of 8±2%2% (p < 0.01 vs. before the dog; p < 0.05 vs. lactation).
Blood pressure increased from 96±± 8 to 108 ± 8 mmHg following the introduction of the dog (p < 0.001 vs. all values before and after).
Similar(47)
Also, dogs 2014-887 and P-853 lived in the same family as dog P-833.
The other contact of dog P-833 was euthanized due to severe illness.
Dog P-833, whose MRSP isolate belonged to ST402 had two contact dogs; P-853 and 2014-887.
These both (dogs P-853 and 2014-887) were living together with the guide dog P-833.
The latter was also seen in our results as dog P-853 had a different sequence type; ST71.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com