Sentence examples for does not significantly harm from inspiring English sources

The Commerce Department ruled today that encircling dolphins with nets a mile wide to catch tuna does not significantly harm them, clearing the way for Mexico and other countries to market their tuna in the United States as dolphin-safe.

"A person should be accorded the right to live his or her life as they see fit (provided, of course, that this does not significantly harm others), and that includes the very end of their life," she wrote in one of her nearly 40 journal articles on this subject.

Although this is not a realistic assumption for stars, we have experienced that it does not significantly harm the estimation.

But it appears that making typos in your personal profile does not significantly harm the impression you make, unless you type your profile wearing ski gloves.

The results of this clinical study indicate that the method of side-to-side neurorrhaphy, which does not block nerve regeneration in the injured nerve and does not significantly harm the normal donor nerve, is feasible and improves motor and sensory nerve function.

Defense lawyers acknowledged the dumping of DDT into the ocean but argued that those actions were legal and did not significantly harm marine life, fishing or public health.

Editors' Note: January 6 , 2003 Monday An article on Wednesday reported a Commerce Department ruling that the nets used in catching tuna did not significantly harm dolphins -- a decision that cleared the way for Mexico and other countries to market tuna in the United States as dolphin-safe.

Savulescu (2007a) argues for a 'duty of easy rescue' regardless of whether the fetus counts as a person, he claims, a pregnant woman has a duty to allow acts that do not significantly harm her while protecting her future child from significant harm (see also Draper 1996).

The results of the present study are similar to those of a previous study conducted by Beautrais and colleagues, who reported that a postcard intervention did not significantly reduce self-harm reoccurrences [ 22].

For example, Stockwell and colleagues [95] p. 1524 conclude that "respondents' reports as to whether the price of drinks was discounted... did not significantly predict either heavy drinking or harm".

Three items did not significantly improve over a chance prediction, these were: the two self-harm items (S2 Seriousness of Self-Harm; and S4 – Immediacy of Self-Harm Risk); and the item measuring previous institutional behaviour (S10).