does not now have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not now have" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is currently lacking or absent at this moment in time. Example: "The company does not now have the resources to expand its operations."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

30 human-written examples

(Alfa Romeo does not now have an American distributor).

The New York Times - Style

The Board does not now have unfettered discretion in refusing to redeem the Rights.

Harvard University

LOCOG did not then, and does not now, have any power to change the competition schedule".

The New York Times

The jail does not now have double bunks but many jails in the state do.

The New York Times

Locog did not then, and does not now, have any power to change the competition schedule".

The Guardian - Sport

Experts say the country does not now have a civilian nuclear program to produce electricity.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

30 human-written examples

When he joins the board next month, he will give it something it doesn't now have: a little credibility.

The New York Times

Ford needs something it doesn't now have and can't quickly produce: lots of hot new high-volume cars and trucks.

Forbes

"We do not now have evidence that Bush had any involvement in the contracts at issue. . .

The Washington Post

Students who are U.S. citizens must hold a passport in order to travel abroad, and should apply for one immediately if they do not now have one.

Cornell University

The kidnapper did not now have to reach his or her intended destination, as had previously been thought.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using synonyms such as "currently lacks" or "presently lacks" to add variety to your writing while maintaining clarity and precision.

Common error

Avoid using "does not now have" when referring to a past or future state. Ensure your tense aligns with the intended time frame; otherwise, use alternative phrasing to reflect the correct temporal context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not now have" functions as a declarative statement indicating the present absence or lack of something. Ludwig confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage. It asserts a state of non-possession at the current time.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

1%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "does not now have" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression for indicating a present lack or absence. As confirmed by Ludwig, it functions primarily to state a fact about a current deficiency, often found in news, academic, and general contexts. For alternative phrasing, consider options such as ""currently lacks"" or "does not presently possess". When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly specifying the time frame and avoid using it in contexts where a different tense is required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

currently lacks

Emphasizes the present deficiency.

does not presently possess

A more formal way of stating the absence of something.

is currently without

Highlights the state of being without something at the moment.

does not at this time have

Adds a temporal emphasis to the lack of possession.

lacks at the moment

Focuses on the immediate absence.

is missing

A simpler way to indicate absence.

does not include

Implies that something is not part of a whole.

is devoid of

Suggests a complete absence of something.

has no

A direct and concise way to express lack of possession.

is not equipped with

Indicates the absence of necessary equipment or features.

FAQs

What does "does not now have" mean?

The phrase "does not now have" indicates that something lacks or does not possess something at the present time. It emphasizes the current absence or deficiency of something.

How can I use "does not now have" in a sentence?

You can use "does not now have" to indicate that a person, object, or organization lacks something currently. For example, "The company "currently lacks" the resources to expand its operations."

Are there alternatives to "does not now have"?

Yes, alternatives include phrases like ""currently lacks"", "does not presently possess", or "is currently without", depending on the level of formality required.

Is it grammatically correct to say "does not now have"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct to use "does not now have". However, ensure that the use of "now" is necessary for emphasis, as it can sometimes be redundant. Ludwig confirms its validity.