Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Here a short sketch of the argument may suffice (see also Benbaji (2005), 324 326): If person X has the need for something (needs something) that person Y wishes to have but does not need, then, prima facie, we ought to fulfil the needs of person X.
One does not need, then, to use the precise autoantigen driving the immune response to produce regulatory T-cells leading to long-term tolerance while avoiding systemic side effects.
Similar(58)
If you spend money on something that you do not need, then you will be farther from your goal.
If you used to go out often and spend lots for stuff you do not need, then these count as a waste.
When you're not getting what you need, or you're getting things you don't need, then it's not working well.
"But if this swap stops someone, somewhere along the line, buying something they don't need, then that's got to be a good thing".
If it does not need authentication, then remove WebAuth.
Put simply, if the truth you are telling does not need telling then you are being rude.
After all, if a game does not need a box then surely you do not need box art.
A sort of, "Well, if Facebook doesn't need coal, then maybe we don't either".
From reliable sources, he did not need Viagra then.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com