does not divide

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not divide" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in mathematical contexts to indicate that one number cannot be evenly divided by another. Example: "The number 5 does not divide evenly into 18, as it results in a fraction."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

God does not divide His creation".

The Guardian - Travel

But the issue does not divide neatly along sectarian lines.

The Economist

And the problem does not divide neatly along party lines.

The Guardian

It is hard to find an auto-safety controversy that does not divide along these lines.

The New Yorker

"A competitive primary does not divide us," Mr. Romney told his cheering supporters.

The New York Times

One thing that does not divide Norway, apparently, is its love of discussing Norwegian wood.

The New York Times

"The Line of Control does not divide Kashmir into two legal parts".

The New York Times

"Secularism in our country does not divide," he told reporters after meeting with Muslim leaders.

The New York Times

American painting of the 18th and 19th centuries does not divide neatly into naïve versus nonnaïve.

The New York Times - Arts

Unlike in the US, torture does not divide the British political spectrum.

The Guardian - Opinion

"A competitive primary does not divide us, it prepares us, and we will win," Mr. Romney said.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about mathematical concepts, use "does not divide" to clearly indicate that one number cannot be evenly divided by another. For example, "7 does not divide 23 evenly".

Common error

Avoid using "does not divide" when you mean something simply doesn't share or distribute something. For example, instead of saying "He does not divide his time well", say "He doesn't manage his time well".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not divide" functions as a verbal phrase expressing negation. It indicates that one thing does not split, separate, or evenly allocate another, as shown in Ludwig AI. It can be used in mathematical contexts, political discourse, or general descriptions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

45%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not divide" is a versatile and commonly used expression that indicates a lack of separation or division. Ludwig AI identifies its primary function as a verbal phrase of negation, serving to assert unity or the absence of a dividing factor. It appears frequently in news media and scientific publications, as well as encyclopedia articles, demonstrating its wide applicability. The phrase is grammatically sound, and its usage is consistent across various contexts. While alternatives such as "does not separate" or "is indivisible" exist, "does not divide" offers a clear and direct way to express the absence of division.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not split

A simpler and more direct alternative to "does not divide".

does not separate

Focuses on the lack of separation rather than division.

is indivisible

Highlights the inherent unity and lack of separability.

does not cleave

Implies a stronger, more forceful failure to split.

is not fragmented

Focuses on the lack of fragmentation, implying no division.

is not a dividing factor

Emphasizes that something does not cause disagreement or separation.

does not partition

More formal, suggesting no formation of distinct groups.

does not bisect

Specifically refers to not cutting something into two equal parts.

remains unified

Highlights the state of unity instead of the action of dividing.

does not discriminate

Suggests an absence of division based on prejudice or bias.

FAQs

How can I use "does not divide" in a mathematical context?

In mathematics, "does not divide" indicates that one number cannot be evenly divided by another, resulting in a remainder or a fraction. For example, "3 does not divide 10 evenly".

What are some alternatives to "does not divide" when discussing unity?

When referring to unity or lack of separation, you can use alternatives like "does not separate", "is indivisible", or "remains unified".

Which is correct, "does not divide" or "doesn't divide"?

"Does not divide" and "doesn't divide" are both grammatically correct. "Doesn't divide" is a contraction of "does not divide" and is more informal.

What's the difference between "does not divide" and "is not a factor of"?

"Does not divide" and "is not a factor of" are similar in meaning, especially in mathematical contexts. "Does not divide" directly states that one number cannot be evenly divided by another, while "is not a factor of" implies that the first number is not a divisor of the second.