does it entail to be

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does it entail to be" is not correct in English.
A more appropriate construction would be "does it entail being." Example: "Does it entail being present at the meeting to understand the project requirements?"

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

What does it entail, to be a conduit from art to money?

The Guardian

So what exactly does it entail to be a business fellow?

Science Magazine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

In conclusion, I will mention two areas that need more attention: (1) The claim that the family is not private is not the same as the claim that there is no value to having a concept of privacy, nor does it entail that there is no way to draw a useful distinction between the private and public realms.

SEP

If legitimacy is understood normatively, what does it entail?

SEP

The core finding of the project was that women do not chose 'hard' sciences, because they do not have access to all the information of what that choice would entail and when they do it tends to be negative and biased.

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

The notion of semantic correctness is non-normative in just this sense: That an application of e is correct, does not entail that it ought to be made, and, conversely, incorrect applications do not immediately imply that S has violated any semantic prescription.

SEP

However, the weakened version of the independence principle, on which only atomic facts involving different particulars are independent, does not entail that it is possible that "a is red" and "a is blue" may both be true.

SEP

It does not entail them, nor is it entailed by them.

SEP

Can this simple reality be modulated and if that is the case does it not entail multiplicity in the godhead?

SEP

Being able to argue that the original, non-inferential justification for $B$ has not been undermined, does not entail being able to argue for $B$.

SEP

expresses the idea that the subject's evidence does not entail what is said to be known hence, it does not entail that every proposition contrary to p is not true.[23] According to Stanley, however, this is not the best reading of the possibility clauses CKAs contain.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for grammatical precision, replace the phrase "does it entail to be" with alternatives like "what does it mean to be" or "what is involved in being" for clearer communication.

Common error

Avoid using "does it entail to be" when you actually mean "does it require being". The former is grammatically awkward; the latter is direct and easily understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does it entail to be" is intended to inquire about the implications or requirements associated with a particular state or action. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests more appropriate constructions.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "does it entail to be" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies that although it appears in some sources, it is advisable to use more precise and grammatically correct alternatives like "what does it mean to be" or "what is involved in being". Predominantly found in Science and News & Media, the phrase aims to understand implications or requirements. When writing, avoid this construction and opt for clearer alternatives to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

what does it require to be

Uses "require" to indicate necessity, changing the verb while retaining the meaning.

what is involved in being

Replaces "entail" with "involved", focusing on what is included or necessary.

what does it mean to be

Focuses on the meaning rather than the specific entailment, shifting the grammatical structure.

what does it take to be

Emphasizes the effort or actions needed, changing the verb and focusing on prerequisites.

what are the necessities of being

Highlights the essential requirements, using a more formal tone.

what are the prerequisites for being

Similar to 'necessities' but focuses specifically on what comes before.

what are the implications of being

Focuses on the consequences or results, changing the core emphasis slightly.

what are the demands of being

Highlights the efforts involved, shifting the emphasis from implication to action.

what duties does it involve to be

Involves a structural change to focus on responsibilities.

what responsibilities does it include to be

Focuses specifically on the responsibilities, but it's not grammatically correct.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "does it entail to be"?

Consider using phrases like "what does it mean to be" or "what is involved in being" for clarity and correctness.

How can I use "entail" correctly in a question?

Instead of "does it entail to be", ask "does it entail being...?" or rephrase the sentence to use "entail" in a statement, such as "being a business fellow entails support and training".

Is "does it entail to be" ever considered acceptable?

While some sources may use "does it entail to be", it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Opt for clearer and more standard alternatives.

What's the difference between "does it entail to be" and "does it require being"?

"Does it entail to be" is grammatically incorrect. A correct alternative is "does it require being" which focuses on what is necessary or demanded.