"documents review" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the act of examining or evaluating various documents. You can use it when describing a task or process related to reading and analyzing documents, such as in a work or academic setting. For example: - "As part of our research project, we conducted a thorough documents review to gather information about the company's history and operations." - "Before finalizing the contract, our legal team will conduct a documents review to ensure all necessary paperwork is in order." - "The board of directors held a documents review to assess the financial statements and make strategic decisions for the company."
Books; numerous papers published in leading professional journals; conference papers; policy documents; review articles and commentaries.
Two review teams, who were directed by the government to examine possible reforms, published their recommendations in two documents: Review of Part 1 of the Sex Offenders Act 1997 and Setting the Boundaries[pdf].
Research was conducted through literature and documents review, participant observation through direct involvement in community activities along several years (2008 2016), and semi-structured and structured interviews applied respectively to members of the DC and to users of the RESEX during 2012 and 2013.
In the college edition of These United States, Gilmore and Sugrue seamlessly weave insightful analysis with all of the support tools needed by students and instructors alike, including paired primary source documents, review questions, key terms, maps, and figures in a dynamic four-color design.
In this research, customer satisfaction attributes are considered as topics to be obtained from the documents (review comments).
Equipped with a 4-inch touchscreen display featuring Nokia ClearBlack technology for improved outdoor visibility and a full keyboard, business users will find the Nokia E7 is the perfect shape and size to work on documents, review spreadsheets, or read and edit slides.
"I also took my notes on the documents reviewed.
COIC documents reviewed by the inspector general state that it has no intelligence collection role.
Federal documents reviewed by The Post show the suicide watch lasted less than two days.
Documents reviewed by The New York Times show a closer relationship than previously reported between the HNA Group and Pacific American Corporation.
The documents reviewed by the Guardian confirm there was extensive cooperation between SCL and Henley.
