Sentence examples for documents are relevant from inspiring English sources

RefMed [ 28] provides a multi-level relevance feedback capability with which searchers can make explicit (i.e., the searcher selects both which documents are relevant and non-relevant) relevance judgments for documents retrieved by a PubMed search.

Systems using implicit relevance judgments do not ask the searcher which documents are relevant, or not, but rather try to infer relevance from observable user behavior, e.g., how long a user looks at a document or whether the user prints the document.

The informed consent process and documents are relevant to the Principal Investigator and all suitably qualified and trained staff involved in this process.

During the discussion of relevance feedback in Section 9.1.2, we observed that if we have some known relevant and nonrelevant documents, then we can straightforwardly start to estimate the probability of a term appearing in a relevant document, and that this could be the basis of a classifier that decides whether documents are relevant or not.

When documents are "relevant to the litigation, they shouldn't be under seal, even if they are not – are embarrassing to Monsanto, you know, even if Monsanto doesn't like what they say".

"If the documents are relevant to the Russian investigation or to the firing of [FBI Director James] Comey which is encompassed in this investigation, any lawyer would advise Jared to preserve them," said Bill Jeffress, a partner at Baker Botts who was part of Lewis Scooter Libbyby's legal defense team.

Also, in two studies [ 17, 18] on Medline searching, there was considerable disagreement by those judging relevance of the retrieved documents regarding which documents were relevant to a given query.

"If these new documents were relevant to the N.A.S.'s review why were they previously undisclosed and withheld?" Mr. Holt wrote.

The survey found that 43.3percentt of recruiters-employers did not think creating Internet documents was relevant, and 26.7percentt were not looking for those skills at all.

Moreover, defense lawyers would be required to show that the withheld documents were relevant to their defense of Mr. McVeigh and could have affected the jury's consideration of the case against him.

Critics say that only a handful of the 47 studies cited in the document are relevant to the issue of validity testing specifically rather than just drug testing generally, and they note that this handful involved just 18 subjects, only 3 of whom were women.