Sentence examples for documents are assessed from inspiring English sources

Clearly, our experiments retrieving Tier 2 from the Tier 1 result set do not completely match the manual process of reviewing, in which full-text documents are assessed against the inclusion and exclusion criterion and PICO specifications (our ranking algorithms continue to use only citations - abstract plus metadata - for each tier).

Following the initial search, documents were assessed to identify those containing information about the topic areas for this assessment.

Thirty-one full documents were assessed and nine studies met inclusion criteria.

After rounds of physical challenges (ten instances of handling each), the documents were assessed for changes to their physical state, i.e. deterioration.

Documents were assessed based on four criteria developed by Scott [ 15].

All documents were assessed for the level of evidence they provided.

After the pilot phase, all documents were assessed by one researcher and then independently by a second researcher.

Relevant approved teaching documents were assessed for their suitability as competency-based FP teaching tools against predefined criteria.

Documents were assessed for criteria on relevance, reliability and origin, that is published or approved by national screening organisations, national government or national health boards.

The performance of our system on our manually annotated corpus of 40 documents is assessed and the results are summarized in Tables 7 and 8. OMM system results are provided in an additional file [see Additional file 3].

In the case of documents for which no particular value is elicited, obviously missing text in a document leads to that document being assessed as unfit for use.