Methodology: Review of project related documents; focus group discussion and key informant interviews with those who can provide valuable information at Federal, Regional Woreda, Kebele, and Community levels primarily to measure the effectiveness, relevance and sustainability of the project through visits to the four regions, the 8 project woredas and 17 kebeles.
The evaluation was done by a review of documents, focus group discussions with stakeholders and field visits.
We resolved disagreements through group discussion, and documented the correspondence between instrument items or elements and domains.
The qualitative information collected through focus group discussion (FGD) are collated and documented as case studies.
The qualitative information collected through focus group discussion (FGD) are collated and documented as case studies. .
The study was set in Odisha, India and the methods for analysis were mainly qualitative, built on program documents, field surveys, interviews and focus group discussion with relevant actors.
Using a case study research design, the study draws on multiple qualitative methods to gather evidence including: document review, focus group discussions, flood victims' interviews, institutional consultation and field observation.
The three main research methods used in the study were semi-structured interviews, content analysis of policy documents, and focus group discussions with local communities and indigenous peoples in south and east Cameroon.
To understand the development of inter-sectoral participation in the three intervention municipalities of Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Programme (SDPP) case studies with a longitudinal assessment were conducted using the spidergram method, document analysis and group discussions.
Insights from the key informant interviews were triangulated with documents and focus group discussions.
