Sentence examples for document which argues that from inspiring English sources

The NFRN's president, Linda Sood, submitted what she referred to as "an explosive 32-page document", which argues that hundreds of independent newsagents have been forced to close because of the monopolistic nature of newspaper distribution.

The memo is a mere 3-and-a-half page document, which argues that the intelligence community did not fully disclose to the FISA court that some of the evidence against Page had been collected by a former intelligence operative being paid by the DNC and Hillary Clinton.

One answer is Cat's latest document – Zero Carbon Britain, which argues that it is possible to achieve zero emissions in the UK using current technology, if only politicians have the will, and the public is supportive.

As evidence he cites a single document: a report by 'analyst' Jim Chisholm which argues that "in the UK at least, there is no such correlation [between online rise and print decline]".

The most damning document is an August 1 2002 memo from Jay Bybee, then assistant attorney general, which argues that torture - and even the killing - of prisoners could be justified to protect US security.

He was one of the co-authors and circulators of a document called "2,000 Words," which argued that strategies calling for a human face on Communism did not go far enough.

"These medications have left Mr. Stanford in an unfocused and numbed state of mind," according to the filing, which argued that the drugs were hampering his ability to review documents and prepare for trial.

The founding document of this group was the Orange Book, a collection of essays published in 2004, which argued that the party needed to find market-friendly solutions to policy problems.

The documents are part of a lawsuit brought by New York and several other states and cities, which argue adding the citizenship question is unconstitutional and that Ross abused his discretion in deciding to add the question.

In a key passage in the document – which is unsigned – it argues that for a US citizen who has rights under the due process clause and the fourth amendment, "that individual's citizenship would not immunise from a lethal operation".

In the document, Peters argues that Heymann withheld exculpatory evidence.