Exact(40)
Average DNA divergence between Neandertals and humans.
We also estimated the DNA divergence (K) between each pair of species for the entire region of Hd6 (Table 3).
DNA divergence observed in existing landraces, cultivars, and wild relatives can now be determined accurately, so the order of major DNA changes such as single nucleotide polymorphisms during the domestication process can be abducted owing to relatively low mutation rates.
This paleontological dating is in substantive agreement with molecular estimates for the origin of H. sapiens based on DNA divergence observed among modern human populations (e.g., Harpending and Rogers 2000; Behar et al. 2008; Campbell and Tishkoff 2008).
This paper addresses both potential biases in DNA divergence estimation by sampling range-wide variation in several morphologically distinct, endemic butterfly species in the genus Heteropsis, some of which are sister taxa.
Assuming an average DNA divergence of 6.5 million years between the human and chimpanzee genomes (52), this results in a point estimate for the average divergence of Neandertal and modern human autosomal DNA sequences of 825,000 years.
Similar(20)
Distributions of DNA divergences to humans.
DNA divergences estimated for each of these specimens to the human reference genome (table S26) show that none of them differ significantly from the Vindija individuals, although these estimates are relatively uncertain due to the limited amount of DNA sequence data.
Total and net DNA divergences between lineages were estimated at 1.44 3.18% and 0.86 2.40%, respectively.
Nucleotide and haplotype diversities, as well as total and net DNA divergences were calculated for each lineage (Table 1).
In the Branchiopoda, when multiple types of evidence are available (ecological and/or nuclear markers to complement mitochondrial DNA), divergences of >5% are typically indicative of different species [24], [28].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com