Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Although up to 12 distinct DNA components have been identified from virion preparations from members of different nanovirus species, there is increasing evidence that the babuvirus genome consists of six distinct ssDNAs [ 8, 22, 23, 40], while the nanovirus genome comprises eight species of circular ssDNA [ 17, 42, 46, 47].
Similar(59)
-wrap-foot> The corresponding values for Mor23 are shown in the lower (non-shaded) half of the table * Dashes indicate that comparison was not possible because a homologous DNA component has not (yet) been identified for this nanovirus.
This indicates that for the majority of OW bipartite begomoviruses the DNA-A and DNA-B components have been under distinct evolutionary pressures or have responded differently to the pressure.
Centromeric DNA and protein components have been suggested to evolve rapidly in evolution and be responsible for the organization of functional centromere of emerging species [ 6].
If the DNA-A and DNA-B components had been under the same evolutionary pressure, all the points on the graph would align along the diagonal.
There is also the sequence analysis evidence for PYMV isolates (from Panama, Venezuela and Trinidad) where the same CR has been introgressed simultaneously in DNA-A and DNA-B components having over all very different sequences (C. Fauquet, unpublished results).
But in some cases components have a DNA which is traceable through the supply chain.
Although mismatch repair components have been implicated in DNA homologous recombination repair, the exact function of hMSH2/6 in this pathway is unclear.
Some archaeal components have homologs in eukaryotes that are not involved in DNA replication (fig. 1).
MRN components have also been implicated in the replication and genome stability of several DNA viruses, including herpes simplex [51].
Telomerase RNA components have been identified from many organisms, but no protein component has been demonstrated to catalyze telomeric DNA extension.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com