Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The second row shows the efficiency scores of the administration divisions of the sample hospitals.
The third row shows the efficiency scores of the medical-examination divisions of the sample hospitals.
Similar(58)
The main results are robust to the division of the sample by entry period.
The division of the sample into four distinct diagnostic groups produced substantially different results.
Table 2 shows the division of the sample into groups according to the results of CPQ11 14 and AUQUEI.
For each division of the sample the model was developed from the training data (141 samples) and tested in the rest (62 samples).
The division of the sample in two categories (< or >13 years) for disease duration was merely based on the sample distribution.
Concentration of DNA or division of the sample over multiple PCR reactions could resolve this problem, but would result in a more elaborate method.
Division of the sample into symptomatic and asymptomatic patients yielded no difference in most of the items, except that symptomatic children and adolescents felt that they were not invited out for meals because of CD more often than asymptomatic ones (p < 0.01, data not shown), and worried more about staying in hospital because of CD (p < 0.001).
In order to develop a first comparison between the results of AUQUEI and CPQ11 14 we made a division of the sample into 4 groups:G1 = good HRQoL (AUQUEI) and OHRQOL (CPQ11 14) reported; G2 = good HRQoL reported and bad OHRQOL; G3 = both bad generic HRQoL and OHRQOL reported; G4 = bad generic HRQoL reported and good OHRQoL.
Choice probability was calculated in an epoch before the onset of the stimulus (baseline epoch, −400 to −100 ms before sample onset), a post-sample epoch (200 1000 ms after sample onset) and in three divisions of the post-sample epoch (75 375 ms after sample onset, 375 675 ms after sample onset and 675 975 ms after sample onset).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com