divided to

USAGE SUMMARY

The use of the term "divided to" is not common in written English. It is more customary to use divide into or divide among. For example: We divided the chocolate cake into four equal pieces.

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This talk will be divided to two parts.

Cornell University

The A.F.L.-C.I.O. has been too divided to endorse anyone.

The New York Times

The leaves are deeply divided to pinnately compound.

Britannica

The students divided to four people group randomly.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Each class was divided to two groups randomly.

Computers & Education

The channel is divided to pass through our site in two directions.

Columbia University

The opposition, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), is too divided to be effective.

The Guardian - Opinion

The dining room could be divided to make a second bedroom.

The New York Times

The master suite could be divided to create a third bedroom.

The New York Times

It shows the Tory Party too divided to stand up for hard-working families".

The Guardian

The four London-bound lanes will be divided to carry passenger traffic both ways.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While "divided to" is frequently used, consider using "divided into" for improved grammatical correctness. This adjustment enhances clarity and professionalism, especially in formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "divided to" in formal writing. Always double-check and replace it with "divided into" to maintain grammatical accuracy. Remember, "into" specifies the resulting parts, while "to" usually indicates direction or recipient.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "divided to" functions primarily as a verb phrase, often indicating the act of separation or allocation. It suggests that something is being separated or distributed in a specific way, although Ludwig AI points out that "divided into" is often a more grammatically sound choice.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

37%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "divided to" appears frequently in various contexts, including scientific, news, and academic sources, it is often considered less grammatically correct than "divided into". Ludwig AI suggests that "divided into" is a safer and more precise choice, particularly in formal writing. Common alternatives include "split into" and "separated into", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Despite its prevalence, it's advisable to favor "divided into" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. The phrase tends to function descriptively, informing the reader about the process or results of a division.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

divided into

Replaces the preposition "to" with "into", which is the more standard and grammatically correct form.

split into

Replaces "divided" with "split" and changes the preposition to "into", emphasizing separation.

separated into

Uses "separated" instead of "divided", conveying a similar meaning of distinct parts.

partitioned into

Replaces "divided" with "partitioned", suggesting a more structured division.

sectioned off into

Implies creating distinct sections within a larger entity.

distributed among

Highlights the action of spreading something among multiple entities.

allocated to

Focuses on assigning portions to different recipients rather than just separation.

apportioned to

Emphasizes the fair distribution of something among different recipients.

grouped into

Focuses on forming groups after dividing the original set.

categorized into

Highlights the classification aspect of dividing items.

FAQs

What's the grammatically correct way to express division: "divided to" or "divided into"?

The grammatically preferred phrase is "divided into". While "divided to" is sometimes used, it's less common and can be considered incorrect in formal contexts.

When is it appropriate to use "divided to"?

Although "divided to" appears in various sources, it's generally safer to opt for "divided into", especially in formal writing. The prevalence of "divided to" doesn't necessarily make it correct.

What can I say instead of "divided to"?

You can use alternatives like "divided into", "split into", or "separated into" depending on the context.

Is there a difference in meaning between "divided to" and "divided into"?

While the intended meaning is often clear, "divided into" more accurately conveys the idea of separating something into distinct parts. Using "divided to" may sound awkward or grammatically incorrect to some readers.