divided in thirty

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "divided in thirty" is not correct in standard written English; the correct expression is "divided into thirty." You can use it when describing a division of something into thirty equal parts or sections.
Example: "The cake was divided into thirty equal slices for the party."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The four states with 156 administrative units ('Boma') were divided in thirty survey clusters (our primary sample units).

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The plan is divided in two parts.

The New York Times

This subject divided in three parts.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The results are divided in two parts.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The course is divided in five parts.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The book is divided in two parts.

Stanford University

It is divided in two subseries.

Columbia University

"The day was divided in two.

The Guardian

Internally, each box was divided in three.

The New York Times - Science

So the building is divided in two.

The New York Times

Then the bank is divided in two.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "divided into" instead of "divided in" when referring to the separation of something into a specific number of parts. For example: "The project was divided into thirty tasks."

Common error

Avoid using "in" after "divided"; the correct preposition is "into". Saying "divided in" is grammatically incorrect and should be replaced with "divided into".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "divided in thirty" functions as a prepositional phrase intended to describe how something is separated, although it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig flags this usage as incorrect, advising against it.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Academia

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "divided in thirty" is grammatically incorrect; the correct form is "divided into thirty". Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase does not follow standard grammar rules. While there is limited occurrence of this phrase, its use is generally discouraged in formal writing. It's more appropriate to use alternatives like "split into thirty" or "partitioned into thirty" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

split into thirty

Uses "split" instead of "divided", providing a more concise alternative.

subdivided into thirty

Replaces "divided" with "subdivided", indicating further division of existing parts.

partitioned into thirty

Replaces "divided" with "partitioned", offering a more formal tone.

separated into thirty

Substitutes "divided" with "separated", emphasizing the act of creating distinct groups.

organized into thirty

Changes "divided" to "organized", highlighting a structured arrangement.

grouped into thirty

Replaces "divided" with "grouped", focusing on the act of assembling into collections.

sectioned into thirty

Uses "sectioned" instead of "divided", implying a clear demarcation of parts.

fragmented into thirty

Substitutes "divided" with "fragmented", focusing on creating smaller pieces.

arranged into thirty

Substitutes "divided" with "arranged", emphasizing a deliberate order.

categorized into thirty

Changes "divided" to "categorized", highlighting classification.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "divided in thirty"?

The correct way to phrase it is "divided into thirty". The preposition "into" is used to indicate the result of a division or separation.

Is "divided in" grammatically correct?

No, "divided in" is not grammatically correct. The correct preposition to use after "divided" when indicating the number of parts is "into".

What can I use instead of "divided in thirty"?

You can use phrases like "split into thirty", "partitioned into thirty", or "separated into thirty".

What's the difference between "divided in thirty" and "divided into thirty"?

"Divided in thirty" is grammatically incorrect, while "divided into thirty" is the correct usage. "Into" indicates the resulting parts after the division.