Land use diversity, percentage of porous land vis-à-vis density significantly contributed to the UHI effect.
We used LSOA to access local area-level values for deprivation (the income domain of the Index of Multiple Deprivation) (Department for Communities and Local Government, 2011) and ethnic diversity (percentage of the population from white ethnic backgrounds) (ONS, 2014b).
However, after controlling for program characteristics such as grade point average, diversity percentage of cohort, public/private institution, and number of faculty, there were no significant associations between scholarly artifacts and 100%% three year pass rates.
Besides on floristic composition richness, diversity, evenness, percentage of woody species and topographic position were assessed for 7 communities.
We conclude that landscape diversity and percentage cover of certain land-use types might serve as useful indicators for species richness at the landscape scale.
However, habitat age had only marginal effect on genetic diversity, as percentage of polymorphic loci (PPL) within all the populations analyzed was similar, viz.
In general, TD had lower diatom density, biomass, species richness, HillN1 diversity, and percentage of Aquatic/Riparian diatoms (AqRi%) than those of Ri (Table 2).
The software program POPGENE v. 1.31 (Yeh et al. 1999) was used to obtain statistics for the genetic diversity parameters, percentage of polymorphic loci (P), allele number per locus (A), effective allele number per locus (Â e) and expected heterozygosity (Ĥ e).
We estimated the following genetic diversity parameters: percentage of polymorphic loci (PL), mean number of observed alleles per locus (na), mean allelic richness per locus (RS), mean private allelic richness per locus (RP), mean gene diversity (HS), and number of multilocus genotypes (NH).
He: expected heterozygosity, Div: average gene diversity, PPL: percentage of polymorphic loci, LTE: lifetime expectancy.
We tabulated general measures of diversity, including percentage of unique sequences, sequence diversity (h), and the mean number of pairwise differences (p) within each sampling area using arlequin version 3.0.1 (Excoffier et al. 2005).
