In group theory and topology, by contrast, it simply makes no sense to talk about "intuitive notions" which could diverge from the notion specified by the relevant axioms.[42] In a similar vein, set theorists sometimes debate whether we should add new axioms to the standard axioms of set theory e.g., large cardinal axioms, or axioms like V=L, or even just axioms like Con(ZFC).
We find that the two notions diverge more for the hard sciences, including physics, engineering, material sciences, and computer sciences, than they do for the geosciences, for biology-medical disciplines, and for the social sciences.
To see how these control-based and choice-based notions diverge, consider a Frankfurtian scenario in which Y comes about as a result of X's choice, but X did not control whether Y came about because had X not chosen to bring about Y, then Y would have been realized through some alternative causal means (Frankfurt 1988).
First, it was the self-appointed protectors of Israel, who determined Hagel suspect because he finds the efforts of the pro-Israel lobby to punish any public official who diverges from the notion that Israel can do no wrong somewhat problematic.
These diverging morphological and physiological properties support the notion that the stages are specialized to occupy distinct ecological niches.
Diverging further from the linear approach of technology, Cooke (2007) develops the notion of "constructed advantage", lying in the "relational embedding" of a particular region's evolution (ibid: 191).
Why this diverging picture?
Analysts offer diverging views.
"Now, their interests are diverging".
