'divergent attitudes' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe two or more opinions that are not in agreement or alignment with one another. For example, "The members of the group had divergent attitudes when discussing potential solutions to the problem."
The friends' divergent attitudes toward Jewishness largely determined their subsequent careers.
The clashes panoramically depicted here ultimately boil down to divergent attitudes toward religion, and the account's central target is Islam.
Their divergent attitudes reflect, among quite a few other things, the evolving ethos of the musical in the decade between them.
To complicate matters, she is beautiful and single, while the skeptical son is a shy bachelor; the romance causes crises of faith for both, as they negotiate their divergent attitudes toward their religion.
How do we rationalize our divergent attitudes toward pet mice, laboratory mice (which Congress has excluded from its definition of "animals"), and the kind of mice that live in walls?
Even after Resolution 3379 was revoked in 1991 because of intense American pressure, a series of increasingly lopsided votes at the United Nations have reflected these divergent attitudes toward Israel and the Palestinians.
However, there may be divergent ethical attitudes between obstetricians and paediatricians towards termination of pregnancy, and a discrepancy in attitudes between these two professional groups regarding pregnant women's obligations towards the fetus [ 34].
Yet the behavior of single men and women hints at divergent gender attitudes toward homeownership.
Time and again she has remonstrated with Rudy and Trudy, but to no avail: "Rudy, you're right to recognize that one can consistently adopt divergent cognitive attitudes to Q when construed classically and when construed constructively.
The Forest Policy has, however, been criticised for its failure to recognise structural obstacles such as lack of information for planning; unbalanced reforestation; over-reliance on log exports; limited institutional capacity; and divergent community attitudes.
It teases out some shared and some divergent beliefs and attitudes in these two philosophers by comparing their characteristic questions and problems to the questions and problems that seem most appropriately to attend to an adequate understanding of games and their histories.
