Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
The results of type I functional divergence (Table 1) suggested that anoctamin genes should be significantly functionally divergent from each other, owing to the evolutionary rate and/or property differences at some amino acid sites.
CGH revealed that this region was not only highly divergent but also showed lineage- and LSPA type -dominant patterns of divergence (Table 4).
The markers varied significantly in mean sequence divergence (Table 1).
We observed that the fastest evolving synonymous sites exhibited higher than expected interspecies divergence (Table 5).
Cases of deep intraspecific divergence (Table 4) can reflect misidentifications, cryptic taxa, ancestral polymorphisms, or introgression.
The remainder show flat trends with no consistent convergence or divergence (Table 1).
Genealogical sorting index values (gsi) indicated that morphotypes within all lakes but Ragnerudsjön showed significant lineage divergence (Table 1).
In both Ficus and Gossypium, ITS exhibited the highest interspecific and rbcL and trnH-psbA the lowest intraspecific divergence (Table 1).
Nth and Nfo are highly conserved among B. pumilus, B. subtilis, and B. licheniformis, but AlkA, Ung, and MutM have greater sequence divergence (Table 2).
Furthermore, despite a lack of nuclear monophyly for most of these population groupings, estimates of their gsi significantly favor independent histories of lineage divergence (Table 3).
In all the other cases, COI sequences of the mixed species were tightly clustered and differed by less than 0.1% divergence (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com