Previous work has explored factors in addition to sequence divergence that influence probe hybridization efficiency in different species, such as variation in labeling, overlap of oligonucleotide probes, alternative splicing, sequence homology to non-target transcripts, insertion/deletion differences, and intraspecific polymorphism [33], [34], [39] [43].
In combination, these observations of relative homogeneity of selection within river systems, but heterogeneity among systems, could reflect a tendency for habitat attributes to differ more among systems or for genetic divergence to influence how populations respond to environmental conditions.
While there is little doubt that purifying selection is required to maintain an optimal function of the mandible, very little is known in how far positive selection to new environmental conditions or neutral divergence processes influence mandible shape between populations and species.
Perhaps the same is true for GBS lineages specific to either bovines or humans, with independent divergence being influenced by high levels of recombination [18], [34].
They were related to parental divergence and influenced by the specific genetic background of parental plants.
(2) The main divergence was influenced by Plio-Pleistocene climate changes with allopatric diversification due to savannah fragmentation during pluvials.
The formal model of the system to be implemented possibly contains internal loops that create divergence and negatively influence the analysis's accuracy.
Additionally we tested the possible artefact attributable to biased species representation by computing within mean species divergence and the influence of presumably non-monophyletic taxa on the divergence distribution.
Furthermore, divergence had limited influence on polymorphism.
The relative impact of these two forces gradually changes with divergence until the influence of introgression is eventually ceased in all genomic regions.
