Four taxa (Botrychium lunaria, Botrychium matricariifolium, Ophioglossum vulgatum and Osmunda regalis) could not be properly included in the trnL-F alignment due to large sequence divergence (differences at so many positions that any alignment would be unreliable).
Given the substantial phylogenetic divergence, differences in genomic organization, and near absence of genomic sequence data for these species, our results attest to the power of FISH for gaining insight into the molecular evolution of understudied organisms.
On the contrary, old SDs did not present divergence differences between telomeres and the rest of the genome.
The post-duplication acceleration has the effect of mitigating the sequence divergence differences between duplicates and singletons.
In contrast to previous results, there were no significant divergence differences between SDs within versus SDs outside rearranged regions.
For a serial founder model with a divergence time of τD = 16000, at a putative time of the Neanderthal divergence, differences in values among populations for each of the three summary statistics are small.
However, this observation can not be exclusively attributed to inversions; because when comparing divergence among copies of human SDs within the inverted regions (recall that most rearrangements took place in the chimpanzee lineage) versus SDs outside the inversion in rearranged chromosomes, there were no divergence differences, although SDs were longer within rearranged regions.
Its relation to functional characteristics is modular and seems modest, with partial association with gene expression divergences, differences between functionally related marks and partial co-variation between marks that may confer stability.
Sensitivity and flux analysis identified the cause of the divergences to differences in the small hydrocarbon chemistry modeling.
However, because the face stimuli contain rigid parts and configurations, whereas the compared stimuli (scrambled faces) did not involve these structural characteristics, it is possible that these divergences reflect differences in the processing of general objects, and are not specific to faces.
