'distributive perspective' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to refer to the notion of looking at something in terms of its broader social or economic impact, the effect it has on various stakeholders, or how it is divided among those involved. For example: "This issue is best addressed from a distributive perspective, with consideration of all parties affected."
Resource management seems to be understood by the participants from a distributive perspective, since they mentioned primarily issues related to equitable distribution (of salaries, equipment, honours, allocations) – that is, in terms of wealth, of risk, of abilities, and of needs.
This "uniformity" refers only to a range of variation in social living conditions that is still acceptable from the perspective of distributive justice, not to the levelling of cultural differences.
This paper critically explores what might be regarded as a Senian perspective of distributive justice in new life sciences innovation.
This paper explores what might be regarded as a Senian perspective of distributive justice in new life sciences innovation.
If the answer is yes then what might be regarded as a Senian perspective of distributive justice in the era of new life science innovation?
The Senian perspective of distributive justice also allows for the gene-environment interaction to be taken seriously on board in order to bring people up to at least a minimum threshold of capabilities.
For Fox a Senian perspective of distributive justice in the genomics and post-genomics era implies a decent genetic minimum that consists of a biological constitution that provides whatever internal components necessary for people to function at adequate level in each of the basic capabilities.
Another national policy issue cited by workers as unjust both from a distributive and procedural injustice perspective was the implementation of the fee free delivery policy, which involved universal exemptions from payment of user fees for delivery services (Ansong-Tornui et al. 2007).
These occurred during different types of surgery, infectious and cardiovascular diseases, hematological disorders and critical illness and showed that distributive shock, from a hemodynamic perspective, covers a much wider definition than just sepsis and septic shock.
This suggests that corrective justice is but distributive justice from an ex post perspective rather than an independent principle of justice.
Because there has been such extensive discussion of the Difference Principle in the last 40 years, there have been numerous criticisms of it from the perspective of all the other theories of distributive justice outlined here.
