Sentence examples for distributional outcomes from inspiring English sources

Findings indicate that conservation and distributional outcomes are highly sensitive to the payment rule chosen and vary across study sites.

It assesses the implications of political struggles between business, government, and societal actors for market structure and resulting competitive and distributional outcomes.

Drawing on a range of international experiences and empirical studies the course will assess the outcomes of these policy changes as well as their distributional outcomes.

The discriminatory, uniform and conditional payment rules tested in these case studies incorporate alternative principles of fairness, while resulting in varying conservation and distributional outcomes.

Greater sensitivity to these factors in policy design could improve distributional outcomes under feed-in tariff policies in England and Wales, and beyond.

This paper creates a general equilibrium model of school attendance, labor supply, wage determination, and aggregate production, which is used to compare alternative redistribution devices in terms of both deadweight loss and distributional outcomes.

This approach estimating associations along outcome distribution also allows us to describe distributional outcome changes associated with increasing exposure.

In this paper, we use the term "migration" with respect to individual movement over space as distinct from "dispersal" because 1) we are not focusing especially on stage specific movement and 2) we are referring to actual movement of individual mosquitoes, not to a distributional outcome of that movement at a population level (i.e. we are using the term sensu [13]).

Peacock et al. developed a distributional approach to the dichotomisation of normally distributed outcomes allowing the presentation of a comparison of proportions with a measure of precision which reflects the comparison of means.

Finally, we found a distributional effect comparing stingy to fair outcomes, and also comparing fair to generous outcomes.

In summary, we find that people punish accidental outcomes in allocator/responder games in a manner that cannot be explained by a pure distributional effect (i.e. aversion to inequitable outcomes).